两种风电供热模式的节煤效果比较

LYU Quan

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

两种风电供热模式的节煤效果比较

更新时间：2025-08-13

- 两种风电供热模式的节煤效果比较
- Automation of Electric Power Systems Vol. 43, Issue 4, Pages: 49-59(2019)
- 作者机构：
  
  大连理工大学电气工程学院,辽宁省,大连市,116024
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
LYU Quan. [J]. Automation of electric power systems, 2019, 43(4): 49-59.
DOI：

LYU Quan. [J]. Automation of electric power systems, 2019, 43(4): 49-59. DOI：

摘要

针对当前风电供热项目使用纯凝电力过多、电锅炉利用率低的问题，提出了风电供热项目与热电厂互补供热的运行模式。在构建风电供热系统基本数学模型的基础上，建立了风电供热系统在独立供热模式和与热电厂互补供热模式下的运行策略模型和节煤效果计算模型。算例中，以实际数据为依据，对整个供暖期两种模式下的风电供热项目进行了模拟运行。结果表明，相对于独立供热模式，互补供热模式不仅在节煤效果上具有优势，而且该模式下风电供热项目无需配置储热，从而可节约投资成本。

Abstract

In the current wind power heating project in the independent heating mode

too much power from condensing thermal unit is used

and utilization rate of the electric boiler is low. So the complementary heating mode with thermoelectric plant is proposed. Based on the general modeling of electric boiler system with storage

the operation strategy and the effect of coal saving of wind power heating project with complementary heating mode are analyzed and modeled. In the case

the operation of the wind power heating project in two different modes is simulated based on the realistic data. The results show that the complementary mode can not only save coal

but also cancel the thermal storage

which has to be installed for wind power heating project in independent heating mode and then save a lot of investment.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

1523

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Equivalent Model and Static Flow Analysis Method for Electricity and Heating Network System

基于电锅炉的热电厂消纳风电方案及其国民经济评价

Related Author

Shi PENG

Ning XIE

Chengmin WANG

Chunyi HUANG

LYU Quan

Chunyi HUANG

Related Institution

School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

College of Electrical Engineering，Dalian University of Technology

⁰